Dawn Calls Pakistan a “Symbolic Divide” – Fauzia Asim Chants Anti Pakistani Slogans

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

 

Why such write-ups are printed?

 

·         To dissolve the independent character of Pakistan

 

·         Make slight of the borders

 

·         Spread the notion as if Pakistanis are longing for abolishing the borders

 

·         The borders are not real; they are symbolic and have no meanings

 

·         Borders have divided the otherwise “united” people

 

It is impossible to even think that a newspaper published from Pakistan is part of Pakistan-finish agenda.

 

Is the Dawn on the enemy take?

 

M. H Askari of the daily DAWN Calls Pakistan’s Ideology as “Invented”

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

 

This piece is a typical case of selling foreign ideas to the Pakistanis. The suggestive line of thought, “de-ideologization” calls for the following

 

·         Divest Kashmir of its historical setting

 

·         Forget about the Muslim identity of the Kashmiris as well as yours

 

·         Do not mention the UN resolutions

 

·         De-ideologization also means:

 

·         Dehumanizing the Kashmir case

 

·         Stripping it to a real-estate piece

 

·         Abandoning the Muslim world view

 

So the ultimate question is – whom does this “brilliant idea” serve?

 

Of Women’s Lib – Abu Fazl Degrades Marriage in Islam

 

[T]he introduction of monogamy was the mark of the woman’s defeat. Since then, her position has not ceased to deteriorate, though perhaps capitalism, carrying the mankind to a qualitatively higher stage of development, pulled her from the utter degradation to which feudalism had reduced her. …………………………………….(Abu Fazl)

 

Source: DAWN, March 3, 2001

 

FAULTLINES EXPOSED

 

This piece is a women’s lib specific hitting at the roots of Islam by way of relating it with feudalism. Women’s liberation is a secular theme and is deftly used by the secularists (irreligious, atheists etc.) to undermine moral values.

 

·         According to the writer, monogamy (Islam’s matrimonial institution) is a bad kind of matrimonial arrangement because it does not allow women to enter into toher kinds of relationship with both men and women.

 

·         Capitalist [which quite incidentally has reduced women to sex objects and allowed freedom to have pre and post marital sex] is relatively good for women!

 

Needless to say such themes are frequently used to undermine the constitution and the moral values it enshrines.