Friday Times’ Khaled Ahmed & V. S. Naipaul Call Pakistan “A Criminal Enterprise”

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

 

·         Friday Times agrees with Naipaul – a congenial hater of Muslims – that Pakistan is a criminal enterprise. If it had not, it would not have borrowed from Naipaul and captioned it as such

 

·         The journal agrees with Naipaul’s convoluted thinking and calls his testimony as faultless

 

·         Islam is barren [never mind the hypocrisy of our establishment and the secularists’ hate for it].

 

Why doesn’t the Friday Times tell his readers that during the past 53 yeas, exception allowed, Islam haters were in power. That Pakistan’s shrinkage took place because of the secular parties – PPP and Awami League who conspired together to cause it.

Moonis Ahmar Wants Pakistan To be Declared As a “Rogue State”

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

 

·         The News often comes up with articles that invite mischief for Pakistan

 

·         The preceding write-up laments the fact that the Security Council and the Group of Seven (G-7) did not impose sanctions on Pakistan for its nuclear explosion

 

·         The paper also cries out loud why Pakistan was not declared as a rogue state

 

Can any Pakistani believe in this kind of infidelity, inviting foreign powers to punish one’s own nation?

The News Wants the “Ridiculous Border” Removed!!!

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

 

This is another piece in line with the News’ agenda to undo Pakistan

 

·         Here again the border between Pakistan and India is being undermined by the adjective “ridiculous”

 

·         The readers are asked to “change” the border with a “passion”

 

·         Peter Boyb, as his name suggests, is a foreigner and is obviously working for India. What was the compulsion to publish this anti Pakistan piece?

 

The only reason is that it is consistent with the News agenda of demolishing Pakistan

 

Would Someone Stop Them…????

by Tarik Jan

The danger of freedom is deliquescence; the danger of strict order is petrifaction.

All civilization have had trouble managing the passion escaping their disruptive consequences and harnessing them to useful and approved activity.

                                                     Peter Grey in his 2-vol the Enlightenment:
                                                     An Interpretation.

Every day that passes convinces us that by misusing freedom our media, exceptions allowed, is guilty of delinquescence – committing crimes against the Pakistani state and the value system of its people. The media crime is, however, far worst than other crimes because of the continual war it is waging against Pakistan – the land that shades them.

• Nation-state is bad and so is patriotism
• Nationalism is parochial and narrow
• Pakistan is a failed state; a worst country in the world
• Pakistan’s Islamic character (even in name) is communal and frightening
• Pakistan has no future
• Confederation with India
• SAARC as a template for pre-independence British India
• The corporate Muslim identity is medieval and bad. For them, either it is South Asian or nothing
• Rewriting history: Pakistanis are Indians.

Besides, the English media has become a fortified bunker for Islam-haters who are continually shelling at the social and moral values of the Pakistani people. The themes run as under:

• Being a Muslim is not a good identity
• Regulating human conduct is reprehensible
• Ghayrat (the idea that no body has the right to (i) dehumanize me nor I should let myself (ii) betray my self-respect) is contemptible.
• Free, irresponsible sex is a “joy of passion” – “moments of divinity” (focus on divinity)

The English press is read by a small section of the people, but it is the most influential section of our society (that is: armed forces, civil servants, corporate managers, judiciary and academia). Would they make right decisions for our nation and state after being subjected to the daily meltdown named English press? Would they stand up for the national agenda stated in our consensual document – the constitution.

That is the question!

Pakistan On The Even of New Millenium – Najam Sethi’s Pro Indian Speech

Najam Sethi’s Speech in India

Fault Lines Exposed!!!

What does Sethi’s Speech in India Say?

Islam is a false ideology and so is the Muslim consciousness. The Ideology that matters is economy.

Sethi gives advice to India: don’t flex your muscles against Pakistan as you will get a similar response. If you want a great power status in South Asia, integrate your economy with Pakistan. Once it becomes dependent, you can eat the whole hog.

The Clear and the Manifest

Both points are interlocked making a sly formula for finishing Pakistan. The underlying concern is the Muslim consciousness, which seeks space for expression and hence  geographical and political independence. Muslim consciousness is thus antagonistic to merger with non-Muslim (secular) consciousness. So what should be done? Sethi offers solution: substitute Islamic consciousness with economic consciousness. Pakistanis will loose drive as an independent people and will get lost in the India continent.

Second, Sethi wants India to discard the warpath with Pakistan because that arouses the fighter in the Pakistani psyche. Instead, he suggests the route of economic integration. A Pakistan dependent on India will be unable to resis or fight back.

Sethi received a lot of flak from the Pakistanis on calling Pakistan a failed state. But neither ISI, which hosted him in the comfortable surroundings of Islamabad, not the Nawaz government, which was settling score with him on personal grounds, bothered to read his infamous speech in India. Sethi’s speck was a recipe for eliminating Pakistan. He could have been sentenced to 8 years in prison under section 123-A Pakistan Penal Code. But who cares! The courts are concerned about their contempt and the politicians about their projection in the print media, as if all else is banality. Their attitude almost says “Hell to Pakistan!”

The Secular Press at Pakistan’s Throat

Albert Camus: If you do not have a dream, invent one.

 

People watched the President of All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) say these words on the television and were struck by the irony that was palpably manifested. A man who invents almost every other day a new nightmare for his nation had the cheek to talk of dreams for his people.

 

This is a strange country. Nothing alarms its rulers, nothing bothers its officials other than the pursuit of their vain desires at the expense of public money.

 

The information environment which is part of the security environment is left to saboteurs and seditious elements that have made the state vulnerable to the enemy machinations. Press, which on other nations stands for the state interests, undermines the foundational values of the nation’s genesis almost every other day and still it creates o stir. It speaks of breaking the state, merging it with India and it cause no ripple in the smug pool of our power apparatus. There seems to be nothing sacrosanct. left, neither the state nor its ideology. Everything is open to ridicule and subversion.

 

Where is the government, where is its profligate, plump bureaucracy, where are its intelligence agencies with their secret funds and powers? Where are the courts? Is their contempt higher in value than the subversion of the state and its insult? Have all of them gone deaf, blind and dumb? Desensitized and dehumanized, they stand discredited because power without love for the state and its honor is a moral equivalent of obscenity.

 

What pains us that a nation that could have become a superpower on its own strength is being cut limb to limb, it has been mercilessly left along in a paralyzed state of uncertainty and paranoia. Like an orphan it has no guardian, with none to wipe tears of blood from its fear stricken face.

 

 We urge the President and Prime Minister and high ranking officials to please stand up for Pakistan. External Security makes little sense if the internal security is not assured and the press cleansed of anti Pakistan secular elements. You are concerned about the lies, which the pres makes about your government; instead, you should be worried about what they write on Pakistan. India will not dare to fight you on the borders, it has launched its foot soldiers, disguised as intellectuals and editors in the secular press to undo Pakistan. You want to attack the enemy. Here is the material. Section 123-A PPC is your weapon. If you cant, then this nation is not going to believe in your high-sounding rhetoric of a strong and safe Pakistan.

 

Tarik Jan

October 14, 2000

Codemnation of the Creation of the State and Advocacy of Abolition of its Sovereignity

123-A. Condemnation of the creation of the State and advocacy of abolition of its sovereignty.

(1) Whoever, within or without Pakistan, with intent to influence or knowing it to be likely that he will influence, any person or the whole or any section of the public, in a manner likely to be prejudicial to the safety of Pakistan, or to endanger the sovereignty of Pakistan in respect of all or any of the or any of the territories lying within its borders, shall by words, spoken or written or by signs or visible representation, condemn the creation of Pakistan by virtue of the partition of India which was effected on the fifteenth day of August, 1974 or Advocate the curtailment or abolition of the sovereignty of Pakistan is respect of all or any of the territories laying within its borders, whether by amalgamation with the territories of neighboring States or otherwise, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment which may extend to ten years, and shall be liable to fine.

(2)  Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force. When any person is proceeded against under this section, it shall be lawful for any Court before which he may be produced in the course of the investigation or trial, to make such order as it may think fit in respect of his movements, of his association or communication with other persons, and of this activities in regard to dissemination of news, propagation of opinions, until such time as the case is finally decided.

(3)  Any Court which is a Court of appeal or of revision in relation to the Court mentioned in sub-section (2) may also make an order under that sub-section.

Subversion Through Journalism

The following is the debriefing of a former Czech Intelligence Officer from Dezinformatsia, which shows how the journalists are used by the enemy state

Q. Let us focus on journalists. You stated in your 1980 Congressional testimony that during your time in the field, you were in contact with the director of a national television network in Western Europe. What other kinds of journalists did you recruit?

A. I did not personally make the recruitment approach, but instead conducted the spotting and assessing of the target. Someone else would conduct the actual recruitment. Therefore, if the operation failed, I would not be exposed. We recruited many more journalists on the left of the political spectrum than in the center or on the right. A range of techniques was used to hook the individuals. Subtle forms of blackmail were used in conjunction with money and the interaction of personalities (developing common interests and concerns). As with all recruitment, the objective was to establish a web of complicity that encircled the agent. Money was used to keep the person happy and producing.

Q. How did you use these journalist recruits? Were they used only to publish articles? What were the themes you focused on?

A. The primary responsibility of these journalists was to publish articles and stories, but these pieces did not emphasize support for Soviet policy. Rather, the major focus concentrated on undermining the United States and NATO, and on creating rifts between West Germany and France or between the United States and its allies. The principal theme argued that the NATO alliance was disintegrating because the United States was militaristic, dangerous, and not sensitive to European needs. For example, in West Germany the United States was charged with ignoring German heritage and culture during the pose-war occupation, and with forcing alien institutions and political culture on the German people. West Germany was presented to the French and to other Europeans as harboring strong Nazi tendencies, and it was claimed that many war criminals had been reinstated into positions of political power in the West German government. This was presented as extremely dangerous for all of Europe.

Q. How did you get the journalists to produce? Did you provide completed articles for them to publish?

I knew of no situation in which completed articles were passed to an agent. This would be operationally awkward, and might end up revealing the association. The reason I say this is because it is extremely difficult to copy someone else’s writing style. I did provide guidelines for the agent to follow. These consisted of a two-or-three page outline of objectives and themes to be covered in a given article. After I had provided these guidelines, the agent then would produce the story. Sometimes I would include materials and information he could draw upon.

Q. Did the journalists you directed serve other purposes? Did you use them for influence operations against other journalists, political figures, or other important associates?

A. All agents, including journalists, were employed for intelligence collection. Thy frequently had access to confidential information that could be quite useful. As for influence operations, during my time we used only a few journalists for this purpose. I would say that the majority of the journalists we directed were not used for influence operations. Only the most reliable individuals, and those with useful connections, were used in this capacity.

Q. How about recruitment? Did you use journalists to recruit other journalists?

A. I would say that it was very rare indeed when an agent could be used in this capacity. He could be used, however, to identify potential targets. Furthermore, if he was acquainted with a target, the agent could assist in gathering the kinds of information necessary to determine whether the target was vulnerable, and how you might catch him.

Q. How closely did headquarters monitor and evaluate journalist operations? What criteria were used to meausre effectiveness?

A. In the case of journalists, the criteria tended to be straightforward: the number of articles published, the quality of these articles, and where they appeared (i.e. whether they were published in a major newspaper). These were the general measures employed. Whether or not the articles persuaded the intended targets is much more difficult to determine, and is quite subjective. A forgery is a good example, as is overt propaganda. The immediate impat of these operations is often unclear. During my time, there was no highly developed system for measuring the immediate impact of disinformation exercises. All such operations were evaluated in terms of their cumulative effect on the target over time. This is the way Moscow and Prague approached such questions during the 1960s.