Dr. Mansur Ejaz of the News Defaces Pakistan’s Military By Calling Military Sacrifices “Fictitious Rhetoric”

FAULTLINES EXPOSED!!!

This is a classic example of the News’ anti-Pakistan tirade:

 

·         Pakistan is a repressive nation [in what sense? What rights it has withheld. Pakistan’s problem is that it tolerates sedition disguised as the freedom of press. For example, the News allows such garbage against Pakistan and the armed forces, while its publisher and the editor are still sage. So much for freedom!]

 

·         It has no right to ask the world to honor its pledge to the Kashmiris’ right of self determination. [translated Kashmir must not accede to Pakistan]

 

·         Armed forces are a sham

 

·         State ideology is compensation to the fundamentalist support to the jihad effort. [Never mind the constitution that declares Islam as its ideology. As to our nation’s constitutional obligation to Islam and its not being represented in the electoral results, how do you know that the fundamentalists (translated Muslims) represent a minority viewpoint? Everybody knows how the elections are conducted. Besides, when did the PPP and Muslim League while asking for votes say to the people that they are secular (anti-Islam). Let them say it in the coming elections of they have guts].

 

·         The liberal elite clamor for becoming a regional power. [Liberals and the desire for making Pakistan a power – you must be kidding. Ideologically, liberals are inclined towards India and against Islam. If there is a liberal who wants Pakistan to be a power, then he is not a liberal. He should search his heart – maybe he is a Muslim.]

 

The Method Employed by the News

 

The whole piece is an exercise to flush out Islam from the body politics of our state so that it becomes enfeebled and India dominates it. The writer himself admits “only an ideologically motivated force (like jihadis) could … fight on the icy cliffs of Kargil.” If Islam is that powerful, it must be good for Pakistan. Second, make the establishment fight and eliminate those who love their ideology and the people.

 

Question to Dr. Mansur Ejaz & The News?

 

If Pakistan is “all bad” and the military establishment is “all failure” then why does the country still stand?

Dr. Inayatullah of the News On Pakistan’s Confederation With India!!!

FAULT LINES EXPOSED!!!

 

The shaded passages in the text make the following statements:

 

·         The state is an abstract entity which mongers war while the people seek peace

 

·         For making peace across the borders, people are willing to take the risk of annoying the state

 

Implied messages to the reader

 

·         Pakistani State is bad; it is imposed

 

·         People should be independent of it.

 

Disinformation to manipulate public opinion

 

People-to-people dialogue is the peoples’ idea independent of the two states

 

Fact

 

The idea of people-to-people dialogue originated at the Indian government level and later sold to a lunatic fringe (secularists) in Pakistan. For instance, read the following:

 

“The prospects of Indo-Pak Trade were…dependent on the development of the most vital of all relations people-to-people contact. The Prime Minister [Narasimaha Rao] said it is not just trade but also the totality of economic, political, cultural cooperation that we have to look at.” (Source: Hindustan Times: April 08, 1996)

Pakistan On The Even of New Millenium – Najam Sethi’s Pro Indian Speech

Najam Sethi’s Speech in India

Fault Lines Exposed!!!

What does Sethi’s Speech in India Say?

Islam is a false ideology and so is the Muslim consciousness. The Ideology that matters is economy.

Sethi gives advice to India: don’t flex your muscles against Pakistan as you will get a similar response. If you want a great power status in South Asia, integrate your economy with Pakistan. Once it becomes dependent, you can eat the whole hog.

The Clear and the Manifest

Both points are interlocked making a sly formula for finishing Pakistan. The underlying concern is the Muslim consciousness, which seeks space for expression and hence  geographical and political independence. Muslim consciousness is thus antagonistic to merger with non-Muslim (secular) consciousness. So what should be done? Sethi offers solution: substitute Islamic consciousness with economic consciousness. Pakistanis will loose drive as an independent people and will get lost in the India continent.

Second, Sethi wants India to discard the warpath with Pakistan because that arouses the fighter in the Pakistani psyche. Instead, he suggests the route of economic integration. A Pakistan dependent on India will be unable to resis or fight back.

Sethi received a lot of flak from the Pakistanis on calling Pakistan a failed state. But neither ISI, which hosted him in the comfortable surroundings of Islamabad, not the Nawaz government, which was settling score with him on personal grounds, bothered to read his infamous speech in India. Sethi’s speck was a recipe for eliminating Pakistan. He could have been sentenced to 8 years in prison under section 123-A Pakistan Penal Code. But who cares! The courts are concerned about their contempt and the politicians about their projection in the print media, as if all else is banality. Their attitude almost says “Hell to Pakistan!”